Background Pony #0B6C
[@Admin](/forums/meta/topics/opening-thread?post_id=60#post_60)
Of course there are ones. AI images obviously are not going anywhere away from world now.
But I just don't understand how someone can't see some inconsistency with words and actions. On derpi there was already policies about AI images which avoided low quality images such as with obvious defects. Just don't see how anyone can believe, that this will work decently here, when in the same time, by their own words, it wasn't worked any good there already, even with much stricter policies with bigger team. At least because of that inconsistency it looks like majority of the team (who is more responsible for decisions) just wanted to somehow get rid of something they don't like. Don't saying they not in their rights, however. But kinda frustrating to be so obviously lied to like this in this community.
Sorry if I seemed to be rude. Didn't have such intention.
Of course there are ones. AI images obviously are not going anywhere away from world now.
But I just don't understand how someone can't see some inconsistency with words and actions. On derpi there was already policies about AI images which avoided low quality images such as with obvious defects. Just don't see how anyone can believe, that this will work decently here, when in the same time, by their own words, it wasn't worked any good there already, even with much stricter policies with bigger team. At least because of that inconsistency it looks like majority of the team (who is more responsible for decisions) just wanted to somehow get rid of something they don't like. Don't saying they not in their rights, however. But kinda frustrating to be so obviously lied to like this in this community.
Sorry if I seemed to be rude. Didn't have such intention.