truekry
Not an Artist
[@Admin](/forums/meta/topics/we-need-quality-standards?post_id=579#post_579)
Okay, that is a reason. But do we need to spam the site with them because of this? A few examples and then a collage would do the same trick. The recent 4-5 sites (with default filter) are flooded with them.
[@Thoryn](/forums/meta/topics/we-need-quality-standards?post_id=582#post_582)
And hide them by default, so people have to opt in instead of out. These are, after all, old faulty pictures. In general we need a low quality tag. "Slob" was one of the main reason why the separation happened and I can see why. If you have a low quality doodle, at least someone tried and put time into it to produce it. Low quality slob gens I can put out 100+ an hour. We need a filter, we need to be a little "picky" with the pictures, since it is so easy to generate garbage. We don't want the already few people interested in AI (other than us who produce AI pics) see all the slob and leave. What I am talking about (few random picked examples):
>>36709t
>>36657t
>>36595t
Any decent model can produce better quality with a few words in the prompt. This screams "I was to lazy to read the description" or "I was to lazy to read a quick tutorial".
[@LightningBolt](/forums/meta/topics/we-need-quality-standards?post_id=583#post_583)
Thanks, will do.
Okay, that is a reason. But do we need to spam the site with them because of this? A few examples and then a collage would do the same trick. The recent 4-5 sites (with default filter) are flooded with them.
[@Thoryn](/forums/meta/topics/we-need-quality-standards?post_id=582#post_582)
And hide them by default, so people have to opt in instead of out. These are, after all, old faulty pictures. In general we need a low quality tag. "Slob" was one of the main reason why the separation happened and I can see why. If you have a low quality doodle, at least someone tried and put time into it to produce it. Low quality slob gens I can put out 100+ an hour. We need a filter, we need to be a little "picky" with the pictures, since it is so easy to generate garbage. We don't want the already few people interested in AI (other than us who produce AI pics) see all the slob and leave. What I am talking about (few random picked examples):
>>36709t
>>36657t
>>36595t
Any decent model can produce better quality with a few words in the prompt. This screams "I was to lazy to read the description" or "I was to lazy to read a quick tutorial".
[@LightningBolt](/forums/meta/topics/we-need-quality-standards?post_id=583#post_583)
Thanks, will do.