truekry
Not an Artist
[@Admin](/forums/meta/topics/we-need-quality-standards?post_id=641#post_641)
Maybe split the tag in minor generation errors and major generation errors? Minor gets a pass while major is hidden by default?
>>37425t
This would be an example of minor errors. Window frame is not complete, slightly weird angle and headboard directly at window.
For major errors we have a few examples in my first post.
To use a tag like "low quality" low quality need a proper definition for AI. If I draw a quick doodle of stick figure ponies it would be "low quality" for a human. Most models have a very high "quality" by default if properly utilized.
>>37195t
>>37173t
>>36939t
These are 3 examples were in my opinion a "low quality" tag would be appropriate. The minimalist style was obviously not intentional and the weird body proportions speak of someone not using the base prompts (score_9, score_8_up, ...).
Here are some examples what I would consider low detail, but not low quality:
>>37793t
>>37763t
The first is stylized and the second tried to be show accurate.
I know this could be weaponized. Any tag can really. But if we not use anything that can be misused, we would sit still in caves eating meals raw.
Maybe split the tag in minor generation errors and major generation errors? Minor gets a pass while major is hidden by default?
>>37425t
This would be an example of minor errors. Window frame is not complete, slightly weird angle and headboard directly at window.
For major errors we have a few examples in my first post.
To use a tag like "low quality" low quality need a proper definition for AI. If I draw a quick doodle of stick figure ponies it would be "low quality" for a human. Most models have a very high "quality" by default if properly utilized.
>>37195t
>>37173t
>>36939t
These are 3 examples were in my opinion a "low quality" tag would be appropriate. The minimalist style was obviously not intentional and the weird body proportions speak of someone not using the base prompts (score_9, score_8_up, ...).
Here are some examples what I would consider low detail, but not low quality:
>>37793t
>>37763t
The first is stylized and the second tried to be show accurate.
I know this could be weaponized. Any tag can really. But if we not use anything that can be misused, we would sit still in caves eating meals raw.