Tantabus
Filters (Default) SettingsRegisterLogin
You guessed it, it's another Rules update. Check here for more info

General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread Search Posts
Started by LightningBolt
Posted
72 replies
Subscribe
Thoryn

Latter Liaison
apple bloom should maybe imply hair bow?
Sure, she can be without it, but 99% (number pulled out of my ass) of the images, it’s there.
For Twilight Sparkle
twilight sparkle (alicorn) makes sense, name followed by race/kind is logical. (no link, couldn’t escape the () properly..)
unicorn twilight however uses it the complete opposite, and doesn’t even use the full name..
Posted Report
Thoryn

Latter Liaison
hair bow, hair ribbonand flower in hair should imply hair ornament (ornament = decorative)
hairband should imply hair accessory (practical, though may also be decorative)
Really though, the whole thing can become a bit of a clusterfuck with gray areas for defining things, because nothing can ever be simple.
Edit: sisters and brothers should imply siblings
PS: Even in case of adoption, it still counts as being siblings legally speaking, it’s not just the biological factor.
PPS: Would not be surprised if it does vary depending on jurisdiction, because again, why would anything be simple.
Nocturn

Moderator
Adjutant
@tyto4tme4l
I did bing -> generator:bing image creator
If someone is using Bing, then I agree tagging generator:bing image creator is useful. But which generator MicroSoft is leveraging behind the scenes will be something that will change with time. So that implication will need to be maintained, and will not always be right for all Bing-generated images that are uploaded - especially during transitional periods.
In particular, I’m concerned about the timeliness and maintenance of having generator:bing image creator imply an individual version of Dall-E, assuming everyone accessing Bing is getting the same core technology.
And there are several ‘generators’ which, like Bing, are really just UIs that are leveraging something else behind the scenes.
Would that information be better expressed in the description of the top tag? For example, adding a description to generator:bing image creator that says that as of December 2024, Bing is using DALL-E 3 model PR16, rather than an implication pointing to DALL-E 3? Then when it changes in the future the new information could be added with the corresponding dates?
Posted Report
Background Pony #C2DE
Let:
official spoiler image implies spoiler image
spoilered image joke implies spoiler image
And, official spoiler image’s description could be:
Images that are officially used as spoiler images for tags on Tantabus. For spoiler images that are drawn in the official style, but not used by the site, please see Spoilered Image Joke
Meanwhile, spoilered image joke’s description might could be (my writing might be poor, so might need changes):
Images that are drawn in the official spoiler image’s style, but not used by the site. For images that are officially used as spoiler images for tags on Tantabus, please see Official Spoiler Image
Posted Report
Edit Preview
Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ ~sub~

Detailed syntax guide