Rules Update - For a short summary on changes, check Here
Welcome! Please check this thread

Posts

For more information, see the search syntax documentation. Search results are sorted by creation date.

Search Results

Tagging Discussion » "prompter:" should change to "artist:" » Post 22

Admin

Administrator
I typed in “pony” and pressed shift-enter. Default model settings, touched nothing else, you can check the chunk. Does that deserve an “artist” tag for me?
I’d say “no”. And frankly neither do Jackson Pollock or whoever taped a banana to a wall deserve to be called “artist”. If we go by some “anything can be art” or whatever definition then the term “artist” has absolutely no meaning at all and thus there’s no reason to want to have it in the first place. Outside of some revanchist sentiment, I guess.
So no, I’d very much like to keep terms like artist or editor or whatever else reserved for people that put more effort into what they create than the average tagger/uploader puts in when typing into an image’s tag box.
  1. “But derpi calls anyone that puts any two lines together an artist!”
  • Yes and I hate that, but it was inherited from ponibooru and socially enforced thanks to hacks like Christopher Wool or Damien Hirst. If I could have changed it without starting WW3 I would have.
  1. “Why not call people that do ai composition artists, then?”
  • Ideally we will, both here and on derpi. Right now, what we’re seeing is what we expected: a lot of people going through their old raw gens and retagging them from ai generated to ai composition, either to “save” them, or out of spite for the new policy / the site. We’ll revisit the topic once those shenanigans are over.
  1. “You just hate AI and this place is set up just to honeypot AI users to pariah them and then shut the place down!”
  • No. I want this place to succeed, and I want people to use AI to create beautiful and amazing things. But what’s been going on in derpi, and elsewhere on the internet, really isn’t leading towards that. For every 1 person that starts putting some work and talent in, that curate or edit what they share, and produces a good looking image… another 9 pop up that type in something like “sally acorn huge boobs large ass hot sexy”, batch of 20, and upload them all regardless of all the horrific flaws and artifacts.
  • Allowing, or even promoting the latter is one of the big reasons AI is looked down on by so many, and it’s what’s keeping the space from flourishing. Sites are flooded with low quality images and it drowns out those that put in the effort, or make it seem like they just got a lucky RNG. A lot of people could have been spending the last two years learning new skills and working on how to improve their art but instead sat waiting for some next model release or technological advancement to fix the issues for them.
  • So yeah, I actually do want to get to the point where people aren’t looked down on for having made something with AI, and I don’t believe the “laissez-faire” policy many appear to want will ever get us there.

Tagging Discussion » "prompter:" should change to "artist:" » Post 21

Tagging Discussion » "Generator:" tags should not imply "ai generated" » Post 1

Scarlet Ribbon

@tyto4tme4l
This is already how a lot of people are using it, and I agree that checkpoint would be a better term, but I also imagine a lot of other people prefer not to let on to exactly what checkpoints they’re using, so having a generic catch-all is probably better in a lot of cases.

Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 79

Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 78

Background Pony #DCD6
For some reason, the site’s svg favicon appears to be the derpi one. The ico one is correct.

Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 77

IgnoreMePlz

Is there a way that Faved ai-generated images on Derpi can automatically be favorited on here when you create your account? I don’t want to waste time rebuilding all my favorites.

Tagging Discussion » "prompter:" should change to "artist:" » Post 19

Tagging Discussion » "prompter:" should change to "artist:" » Post 18

Zealousmagician

So how about for AI composition images? There’s a large degree of intentionality in the changes involved in those images that clearly result in a fully realised vision that was being worked towards from the initial generation (or perhaps even before that). Is such a process not deserving of being called a form of art itself? Would you say that with everything I- for example- have made, I’m only an editor and could not be considered an artist in any fashion?
The AI composition tag on Derpibooru asks that the editor tag be used instead of the artist tag, and I don’t think it should, at the very least not here.

Tagging Discussion » "prompter:" should change to "artist:" » Post 17

Tagging Discussion » derpibooru exclusive should be aliased » Post 1

LemonDrop

Why would it, that tag implied that things were exclusively uploaded on Derpi, it wouldn’t make sense to alias existing instances of that tag. It would make sense though to have a new tantabus exclusive tag for people who solely upload their AI art here though, depending on how useful of information that is (might not be that important really).

Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 2

Background Pony #FFEE
Will subsequent tag changes made on Derpibooru get synced to the posts that had already been imported? Goodness knows I spend enough time cleaning things up and tagging the oft-forgotten basics, I’d hate to have to do it twice.

Tagging Discussion » "prompter:" should change to "artist:" » Post 16

LemonDrop

@Delly
Weird, last time I checked you can be an artist the moment your pencil touches the paper without “years of mastery”. Guess you don’t think very highly of most artists. Imagine telling all the people on Derpi who have only been drawing for a few months “yeah you don’t have countless years of mastery so uhhh you don’t get an artist tag”, just insane lol.
Also I find it amusing that people’s standards are essentially requiring 10+ years of AI art experience on their resume to apply to the “artist” job when this sort of generative AI has only been a thing for 2-3 years now.
@Heat Sink
Appeal to popularity is not a valid argument.
@Annalee
Correct, that rule is outdated and carried over from Derpi and should be removed which kills two birds with one stone. The only reason that rule existed was a “peaceful coexistence” compromise with having both types of artists on the same site. This is a site for AI art specifically now though so caring about what existing digital artists think is no longer a concern as they will not be uploading here anyways.
@Teaspoon
Well I do think they deserve that title because that’s technically what art is. I never claimed it was good art, it’s dogshit art. A lot of art on Derpi is dogshit too though if you haven’t noticed, but that’s ok because learning is a slow process.
Derpi always has been more of an art collective and not a “curated art” site with a quality bar like something such as e621 is, so literally anyone who scribbles on a piece of paper is considered an artist with just as much effort as it takes to generate a low quality image via AI.
Anyways to me that seems like something solvable by just providing upload limitations to discourage quantity over quality at least to have some bare minimum standards in what is being produced. Not really the end of the world and not really an argument against why people using AI aren’t artists.

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 23

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 22

Tagging Discussion » "prompter:" should change to "artist:" » Post 15

Zerowinger

3-3/4" Army Man Fan
@Lord Waite
So the contest is based on the output quantity, not the quality or popularity? (Daily theme contests on NightCafe are based on popular vote, with only one submission per person)

Tagging Discussion » "prompter:" should change to "artist:" » Post 14

Lord Waite

@Teaspoon
Probably worth noting that civitai is running daily contests right now that give you 400 of their on-site currency, buzz, if you submit 20 images using the lora provided. It’s very much encouraging people to spam out 20 low quality images a day.

Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 76

Tagging Discussion » "prompter:" should change to "artist:" » Post 13

Teaspoon

All that considered I think I still lean more towards “artist” than “creator”, but either is better than “prompter” which might as well be an insult in a place like this.
I don’t know if you have, but I’d suggest perusing civitAI; there are accounts with 12k images made in just a few months, practically 90% of their images are definitely horrible. I’d certainly not think anyone slapping in 12 words (optimistically) into the prompt box, not changing default settings, and hitting “Generate Forever” to churn out 250 images in an hour and do no editing or curation at all on them deserves to be called an artist.
Purely outside of the pedantry of what is and isn’t “art”, it’d be an organizational nightmare to separate out the people that do put some work and effort into their creations.

Creative Corner » Model and Lora (and related) Discussion » Post 18

Creative Corner » Model and Lora (and related) Discussion » Post 17

AIPonyAnon

@tyto4tme4l
SD 1.5 based EasyFluff is probably still the best model for very painterly styles, probably because it has a very good understanding of many traditional artists. However, being 1.5 based it’s a lot worse with anatomy and coherence in general, though significantly better than most 1.5 based models.

Tagging Discussion » "prompter:" should change to "artist:" » Post 12

Annalee

Moderator
Adjutant
@Delly
also, on this site, the term artist has a specific meaning under rule #1: it’s for people who make original works that are copyright-protected. calling prompters “artists” could make things confusing and mess with how that rule applies.

Tagging Discussion » "prompter:" should change to "artist:" » Post 11

Tagging Discussion » "prompter:" should change to "artist:" » Post 10

Delly

Administrator
Certified Blueberry
Comparing traditional artistry with prompting is offending everyone, who has spend countless years mastering the art of drawing.
The two are nowhere near on the same level, or at least the kind of prompting that this site is intended for isn’t (As actual art with only some smaller parts being done by AI is still welcome on Derpibooru)
Therefore, the prefix will not be changing. Learn to actually draw if you want to be an artist.

Tagging Discussion » "Generator:" tags should not imply "ai generated" » Topic Opener

tyto4tme4l

Something of an artist
Since “ai composition” is a thing now, tags like “generator:zoinksnoob” should not imply “ai generated” IMO.
BTW: I feel like this “generator” term is pretty vague, I would prefer something like “model” or “checkpoint” instead.

Tagging Discussion » "prompter:" should change to "artist:" » Post 9

LemonDrop

I agree, creating art makes you an artist, and the act of guiding an AI to refine an image into something that matches your vision is the same creative process to any other artform.
Just because it’s “easy” to prompt things by comparison to the tedium of drawn digital art does not mean you’re not an artist, and saying otherwise is just a narrative the anti-AI crowd has spun to diminish people’s work and disrespect the AI artists. It’d be like saying digital artists aren’t artists because it’s a far easier process than that of traditional artwork on canvas with oil paints (no undo, no layering, no fancy effects or infinite brush shapes). This is especially true for more involved AI artwork where inpainting and other touchups are done in post via Photoshop or whatever, it’s hardly solely just “prompting” in that instance.
Course I can somewhat understand concerns over tagging confusion and etc, and to be fair also other areas of art have their own terms, e.g. photographer, cinematographer, game developer, but they all are under the “artist” umbrella if you want a general term. No (non-disparaging) specific term really exists for those who leverage AI heavily yet given it’s such a new medium other than like “AI artist” which specifies the medium a bit more specifically similar to “traditional artist” or “digital artist”, but these are just simplified just to “artist” in terms of tagging on Derpi at least.
“Creator” may be a fair compromise but I still feel like it’s a bit silly to downplay the artistry involved. As the OP said, this is an AI-specific site, so while a blind import of tags may be a bit confusing, in practice one would understand that the “artist” term on this site is contextually referring to AI artists specifically and transform the tags if needed to whatever convention exists on other sites (e.g. if importing from here to Derpi one would replace artist: with prompter: and add ai content or whatever as in theory that tag wouldn’t be needed here).
All that considered I think I still lean more towards “artist” than “creator”, but either is better than “prompter” which might as well be an insult in a place like this.

Default search

If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.

Allowed fields

Field SelectorTypeDescriptionExample
authorLiteralMatches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term.author:Joey
bodyFull TextMatches the body of this post. This is the default field.body:test
created_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation time of this post.created_at:2015
idNumeric RangeMatches the numeric surrogate key for this post.id:1000000
myMetamy:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. my:posts
subjectFull TextMatches the title of the topic.subject:time wasting thread
topic_idLiteralMatches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to.topic_id:7000
topic_positionNumeric RangeMatches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0.topic_position:0
updated_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation or last edit time of this post.updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago
user_idLiteralMatches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term.user_id:211190
forumLiteralMatches the short name for the forum this post belongs to.forum:meta