Posts
Search Results
Site and Policy » The writing on the quality guidelines page is riddled with errors » Topic Opener
IWTCIPP
Honestly, this is just extra insulting.
Images that fail one of the criteria listed further down may to be deleted.
“may to be”
Practically all the examples of errors listed below could be be spotted and fixed before upload
“be be”
These sort of artifacts commonly appear on the the corners of an image
“the the”
Artifact on plant leave is clearly not a detail related to the plant.
“leave” should be “leaf”
Extra limbs, miss-sized torsos or limbs
“miss-sized” should be “mis-sized”
Pinkie’s left forelg vanishes into her apron or just missing entirely.
“forelg”
Big Mac’s arm would be unnaturally long, particularly as it’s wouldn’t be straight.
“it’s wouldn’t be” should be “it wouldn’t be”
Bad hands, too many fingers, things bending how they shouldn’t, weird bumps… Stylization is OK, fleshblobs are not.
“Stylization” shouldn’t be capitalized
AJ’s fingers aren’t great, but they’re not obviously wrong or the close to being the focus of the image.
Extra “the” before “close”
Weird eyes, extra nostrils, mouths that just aren’t right, eyelashes and eyebrows that are blobs or simply broken… There’s a lot of small things that can go wrong here, but given how important the face is, they have a lot of impact; faces are important!
“There’s” shouldn’t be capitalized
Iris / pupil shapes aren’t perfect, but not too bad either. Vague muzzle outline is again OK for cartoonish styles. (and AI really likes four freckes…)
“and” should be capitalized
“freckes”
“freckes”
The two characters on the left are noticeably low quality, and the Flutershy clone on the right is a mess.
“Flutershy”
That beach hair would snap immediately, and one of the supports o the back vanishes.
“hair” should be “chair”
“o” should be “on”
“o” should be “on”
The outline isn’t bad or crunchy, and the weird eyes tears likely intentional.
“eyes tears” should be “eyes/tears”
For a fashion magazine cover, the focus would be the photo/model, so fake “ponish” language is fine. and the big magazine title text is OK; however, the smaller text is mostly just chicken scratches.
“and” should be capitalized
The sign at the top isn’t too prominent or seems important
Nonsensical/contradictory
All in all, I think that page is too low quality and you should delete it.
Showing results 1 - 2 of 2 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |