This was a test image of Flurry Heart I did to see if Imagen knew what she looked like, it produced a really nice output I think. Doesn’t show her wings, though it could be argued they’re under the dress.
Posts
Search Results
Creative Corner » Post Your AI Art! » Post 26
@AIPonyAnon
I only general stallions, so yeah, I’d like to see more.
I only general stallions, so yeah, I’d like to see more.
Creative Corner » Post Your AI Art! » Post 25
Here are my favourite AI-generated pony images, created using my custom model mix, BlueFox Mix.
Creative Corner » Post Your AI Art! » Post 24
This is one of the favorite images of those I’ve generated. I think I managed to get it realistic enough that it feels like you could reach out and feel the fur, but not so realistic that it’s in the uncanny valley.
@LightningBolt
Cute; I need to generate more stallions.
Cute; I need to generate more stallions.
Creative Corner » Post Your AI Art! » Post 23
While I disagree about calling AI images
It makes me wish I could do more local generation.
art myself, this is my favorite one I have generated so far, and why it’s my avatar here. I minorly edited it as AI is terrible at understanding which eye should be what color for heterochromia.
It makes me wish I could do more local generation.
Creative Corner » Post Your AI Art! » Post 22
@Zerowinger
Maybe. What I’m probably going to do from time to time is post ponies cosplaying as/ponified characters from games I’m currently playing.
Maybe. What I’m probably going to do from time to time is post ponies cosplaying as/ponified characters from games I’m currently playing.
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 17
@Background Pony #FE39
That sounds like a good idea.
That sounds like a good idea.
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 16
@AIPonyAnon
Out of curiosity, are you running these checkpoints through a web-based platform like civitai, or are you running them locally on your own machine.
Out of curiosity, are you running these checkpoints through a web-based platform like civitai, or are you running them locally on your own machine.
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 15
Background Pony #FE39
@AIPonyAnon
A lot of people into AI are very, uh, “biased towards horny”.
A lot of people into AI are very, uh, “biased towards horny”.
Could be a good idea to keep this thread populated with SFW stuff you’re proud of (and maybe promote the thread around, on images or elsewhere). Plus, can subscribe to threads.
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 14
@Star Streaker
Yeah, getting the legs to look correct with EasyFluff is a struggle. It likes to leave out a leg a lot of the time. I suspect I just posted it at a horrendous time site-usage-wise.
Yeah, getting the legs to look correct with EasyFluff is a struggle. It likes to leave out a leg a lot of the time. I suspect I just posted it at a horrendous time site-usage-wise.
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 13
@AIPonyAnon
I’d say no, there’s not anything terribly “wrong” with it. Rainbow’s forelegs look a little strange but overall I don’t see anything that’d “break” the image. The surreal style is pretty good and consistent throughout.
I’d say no, there’s not anything terribly “wrong” with it. Rainbow’s forelegs look a little strange but overall I don’t see anything that’d “break” the image. The surreal style is pretty good and consistent throughout.
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 12
@Zerowinger
Yeah, I was going for overly colorful and surreal. The rainbow chest fluff was a side product of bumping the colorfulness up, but I thought it looked cool.
Yeah, I was going for overly colorful and surreal. The rainbow chest fluff was a side product of bumping the colorfulness up, but I thought it looked cool.
I’m not so much worried about it being ignored because it’s unusual, but rather that there’s some issue with it that I’m not perceiving. It not being to the taste of the users here is fine, if that is the case.
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 11
@AIPonyAnon
Well, it is a very unusual image of Dash. Her chest fur and mane kind of look like feathers, plus having that extra splotch of color on her chest might throw people off. Plus the color for the surrounding scenery is kind of strange and gives it a bit of a surreal look, I don’t know if that’s what you were going for or not.
Well, it is a very unusual image of Dash. Her chest fur and mane kind of look like feathers, plus having that extra splotch of color on her chest might throw people off. Plus the color for the surrounding scenery is kind of strange and gives it a bit of a surreal look, I don’t know if that’s what you were going for or not.
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 10
Is there something fundamentally wrong with this image, or did I just hit a lull because of posting time/chance?
Creative Corner » Post Your AI Art! » Post 21
@Bendy and Boney
She looks both cute and cool. Have you ever thought of doing other ponies as KoF characters?
She looks both cute and cool. Have you ever thought of doing other ponies as KoF characters?
Creative Corner » Post Your AI Art! » Post 20
I really like this pic I generated.
It’s a reference of sorts to this weird comic that started circulating over a decade ago. It claimed to be a translation of something from an official German magazine. (it was fake, of course)
In it, Scootaloo was called Terry for whatever reason. Given that I was playing some King of Fighters at the time, I got a terrible idea. But I never really made anything until I was reminded of it recently.
Creative Corner » Post Your AI Art! » Post 19
One of Tempest that I like.
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 9
@Zerowinger
Yeah, that usually works quite well. With both Pony and Noob just adding
Yeah, that usually works quite well. With both Pony and Noob just adding
wings will usually fix it. spread wings and folded wings can help with positioning, but a lot of the time the model will just do what it wants with them.Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 8
Looking for basic errors we can see the following:
- Cadance does not appear to have any sign of wings.
I know I use a very different model from yourself and everyone else, but one thing I’ve noticed that gets the Imagen generator to put wings on characters that should have them is to include prompts like “spread wings” or “wings folded in,” or some other prompt or detail that focuses on wings. Perhaps something similar may work with this checkpoint?
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 7
@Star Streaker
I use Comfy, with what I call a station based workflow. You can see it here:
The door was giving me flashbacks to trying to get things like the tiny bits of backs of chairs sticking out on either side of a character to agree. It’s probably not quite as hard as that.
I use Comfy, with what I call a station based workflow. You can see it here:
The door was giving me flashbacks to trying to get things like the tiny bits of backs of chairs sticking out on either side of a character to agree. It’s probably not quite as hard as that.
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 6
Thank you for the assist!
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 5
@AIPonyAnon
I’m kinda curious, what kind of AI gen workflow do you use? I largely use SD Forge but have been intending to get into Comfy.
I’m kinda curious, what kind of AI gen workflow do you use? I largely use SD Forge but have been intending to get into Comfy.
The door itself is actually relatively easy to fix. I haven’t posted one image yet but there was a Canterlot street view image I generated with a terrible cobblestone path. So I used inpainting and img-img and specified the prompt to only focus on exclusively the road and it gave a much more coherent road while preserving the subjects. You could also do the same for inpainting Cadance’s wings though you’d likely want to use soft inpainting for those.
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 4
She somewhat harshly sticks out with the rest of the image (which is more painterly and muted)
I don’t think Cadance is oversaturated in the technical sense of the term, but I think I get what you mean. The brown of the background doesn’t highlight her, rather it makes her look out of place.
I hadn’t noticed that she does look slightly less painterly than the background when viewed from a distance, thanks for pointing that out. It’s been a struggle with all of the SDXL based models to get good, consistent painterly styles.
Another thing I noticed was that the doorway seems itself split in half with the line being covered up by Cadance herself.
Aaaah, consistent background details are a bane. Trying to get anything to maintain symmetry when split by a character is such a pain.
I’d agree and I think it’s largely due to the nostrils/first person POV. From what I’ve noticed with my admittedly limited artistic talent is that pony faces when facing “forward” tend to point up slightly. Cadance’s muzzle is definitely pointing down but the face could be fixed with an inpaint or adetailer model.
Ah, thanks for pointing that out, the bridge of the muzzle is definitely pointing down too much. I knew something was up, but couldn’t quite figure out what it was. I do detail the face and eyes, but that comes with its own problems. I think this one in particularly is probably a result of cropping too close when detailing and using meesh in the artist mix, as he tends to draw more sloped muzzles.
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 3
@Zerowinger
You might be able to find some trick with your prompts that removes or reduces the issue, but that seems unlikely. This seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding of the model (or it had a lot of images with this mistake in its training data).
You might be able to find some trick with your prompts that removes or reduces the issue, but that seems unlikely. This seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding of the model (or it had a lot of images with this mistake in its training data).
Can you do image-to-image with your current setup? If so, then doing a very basic edit of the image with any old image editor (even mspaint works fine) to just remove the hair and block the background colors in and then doing one or two passes with low-denoise image-to-image should fix it.
If you can’t image-to-image, then Photoshop is probably your best bet. I haven’t used the recent versions of Photoshop, but the tools in it should be able to handle removing things like that very quickly and easily. It’s doable in GIMP, but it’ll be a lot more work because its selection and fixing tools are not as advanced.
You could also try https://huggingface.co/spaces/Sanster/iopaint-lama which uses a model specifically trained on removing things from images, though you’ll likely want to do an image-to-image pass after using it.
Creative Corner » Image Analysis and Feedback Thread » Post 2
So this one is a bit of a problem that made me hem and haw a bit about uploading:
>>33453t (merged)
>>33453t (merged)
Night Glider has some of her hair sticking out of her helmet where it really shouldn’t be. I guess it could be argued there’s a slit for her mane in the back of her helmet that it’s sticking out from and so being blown along with her scarf, but that’s not a very realistic answer.
Google Imagen (or at least as used on NightCafe) unfortunately doesn’t allow for selective edits to select that errant hair for editing out. Would using a program like Gimp or Photoshop be a solution?
Hair sticking out of helmets also seems to be a frequent experience with some of these generations of mine, so would adjustment of negative prompts possibly help?
Showing results 176 - 200 of 242 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |