Posts

For more information, see the search syntax documentation. Search results are sorted by creation date.

Search Results

Site and Policy » We need quality standards » Post 8

Site and Policy » We need quality standards » Post 7

Background Pony #5E6E
@truekry
A lot of the “poor quality” images I uploaded. They’re old things I thought were good at the time they were originally made so saved and thought to share now that there’s a place for it. Maybe the original creators would get a kick out of seeing it again.
Will stick to just “the good stuff” now. Maybe a few “funny” things.
Posted Report

Site and Policy » We need quality standards » Post 6

truekry

Not an Artist
@Admin
Okay, that is a reason. But do we need to spam the site with them because of this? A few examples and then a collage would do the same trick. The recent 4-5 sites (with default filter) are flooded with them.
@Thoryn
And hide them by default, so people have to opt in instead of out. These are, after all, old faulty pictures. In general we need a low quality tag. “Slob” was one of the main reason why the separation happened and I can see why. If you have a low quality doodle, at least someone tried and put time into it to produce it. Low quality slob gens I can put out 100+ an hour. We need a filter, we need to be a little “picky” with the pictures, since it is so easy to generate garbage. We don’t want the already few people interested in AI (other than us who produce AI pics) see all the slob and leave. What I am talking about (few random picked examples):
Any decent model can produce better quality with a few words in the prompt. This screams “I was to lazy to read the description” or “I was to lazy to read a quick tutorial”.
@LightningBolt
Thanks, will do.

Site and Policy » We need quality standards » Post 5

LightningBolt

Moderator
ADHD fueled
Please use links to images on site if they are on the site so people can go to the direct pages themselves. I edited them for you.
Posted Report

Site and Policy » We need quality standards » Post 4

Thoryn

Latter Liaison
If old gens are kept for “historical value” and to show general progression, I guess one alternative could be to add tags like “low quality, early ai” etc to them, and have those tags in the default filter?
Posted Report

Site and Policy » We need quality standards » Post 3

Admin

Administrator
@truekry
Most of these come from the pony AI infancy and some consider them artifacts or interesting for showing how things have progressed.
I can see about poking to skip on the worst of the worst, though.
Posted Report

Site and Policy » We need quality standards » Post 2

Site and Policy » We need quality standards » Post 1

tyto4tme4l

Something of an artist
@truekry
Fortunately, you can hide tag “2022” to not see most of these images, but yeah, I don’t see a point in uploading over 100 very low quality images by this person.
Posted Report

Site and Policy » We need quality standards » Topic Opener

truekry

Not an Artist
Hello and welcome to my little nitpick corner. I know the side is young and all, but we need a quality standard. And I’m not talking about AI mistakes. AI is not it its infancy anymore and it is really easy to generate general good looking ponies these days. (Especially since they don’t have hands.)
You can’t tell me this aren’t gen-dumps. Just by following any guide/video and using a free online gen you get better looking results. I picked these examples at random from the last ten 5-6 pages, but there are so many more.
We need a bare minimum beyond “please only whole ponies, not disfigured garbage”. To quote rule #9:
We strive to create a community that showcases the best of what AI has to offer, from raw generations to artworks that used AI as part of their creation process.

Default search

If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.

Allowed fields

Field SelectorTypeDescriptionExample
authorLiteralMatches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term.author:Joey
bodyFull TextMatches the body of this post. This is the default field.body:test
created_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation time of this post.created_at:2015
idNumeric RangeMatches the numeric surrogate key for this post.id:1000000
myMetamy:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. my:posts
subjectFull TextMatches the title of the topic.subject:time wasting thread
topic_idLiteralMatches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to.topic_id:7000
topic_positionNumeric RangeMatches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0.topic_position:0
updated_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation or last edit time of this post.updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago
user_idLiteralMatches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term.user_id:211190
forumLiteralMatches the short name for the forum this post belongs to.forum:meta