FlatterDeN_AI
Суетолог
When I filed complaints about “Disrespectful attitude towards AI content” They were simply closed without consequences, what the hell discussion were they talking about?! A WHOLE YEAR!
cbat
, or re-rating explicit images as safe.ai content
image comments; I have the script ready.ai content
and 42,435 comments on ai generated
. I will have to export again before January 6, 2025, to get the most updated information.“Style copying” only affects when the style is mimicked perfectly
Do not attempt to deceive or mislead regarding the origins or creators of an image. Regarding artists in the pony and furry fandoms, this can include copying their signature, or perfectly mimicking their unique style (combined with themes) to the point viewers would believe it’s their work.
story in the comments
images.Tagging (and filtering by it) would be good, but I’m not sure there’s the bandwidth for that; as in, uploaders probably wouldn’t tag their own stuff with “negative tags”, so there’d need to be a fair number of active users going around curating each image. It would be an additional workload, albeit distributed on more people that just mods, and avoid “unnecessary deletions”, but could also fail if there aren’t enough people going at it.
Annalee: I wonder though if that limit could be controlled with the same switch that says whether your uploads go into the approval queue or not? I’ll ask staff.Update: This is possible, but will take some work to achieve. Sorry for the inconvenience in the meantime.BigBuggyBastage: Seems like the easy solution would be to maintain the tagging limit on anonymous/BgP users, and substantially increase it for registered users (or at least those who’ve been around for a while).Annalee: I think that might be how we head - just like what currently happens for people uploading images.
I just looked at the nightly dump […]
Does the dump include tag metadata like categories, descriptions, implications, and aliases?